DERIVATIVES REFORM SUFFERS A MIDNIGHT MANGLING

The last day was a long one in the House-Senate conference committee on financial reform. The conferees had been at it since 9:00 a.m. and were rumpled and weary. Big bank lobbyists packed the conference room and trailed out into the hallways. As the clocked ticked into the wee hours, the chances for meaningful financial reform dimmed. At issue was the strong and controversial crack-down on derivatives trading authored by Senate Agriculture Committee Chair Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark).

TAXPAYER STILL BACK RECKLESS WALL STREET TRADING

At about midnight, House Agriculture Chairman U.S. Representative Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) offered an amendment to the Lincoln provision to require big banks to spin off (or push out) their derivatives desks into a separately capitalized affiliate. The Lincoln measure was geared toward ending taxpayer supports (FDIC insurance, Federal Reserve monies) for Wall Street gambling.

Under the Peterson language, the push-out provision was gutted. Some categories of trading were pushed out: including commodities (other than gold), equities, junk rated credit default swaps. The vast majority of OTC derivatives (approximately 90% were not pushed out.) These include interest rates swaps, foreign exchange trades, investment grade credit default swaps, gold.

This means that at the end of the day, taxpayers are still on the hook for the Wall Street casino. Taxpayers will be incensed to discover this the next time these trades go bad and blow up a “too big to fail” institution. The New Dem coalition and the New York delegation who pushed for this hatchet job must be held accountable in November.

However, a great deal of progress was made to bring derivatives out of the shadows and into the light of day. The fact that most derivatives trades will be cleared and exchange traded with capital requiremen, and will bring real transparency to the marketplace for the first time. These measures will make it much costlier to engage in speculation, plus regulators now have the tools to crack down on speculation. CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler, who had been critical of oil and gas speculation, now has the tools to pop these speculative bubbles when they occur.

FRANK FAILED TO PROTECT LOCALITIES

Lincoln also lost her battle to protect state and local government from bad swaps deals by applying a fiduciary responsibility to swaps dealers who sell to localities and other government entities. Activist have identified at least 71 localities who were sold sophisticated swaps. House Finance Committee Chair Barney Frank succeeded in gutting this provision and watering it down to a "code of conduct" requirement leaving states and localities more vulnerable to the Wall Street con.

BROWN WINS LOOPHOLE IN VOLCKER RULE

The Volcker Rule also took a big hit. The rule bans “proprietary trading” or trading for the bank’s own account rather than for customers. The committee passed a strengthened Volcker rule by including the language prepared by Senators Merkley and Levin. The advantage of Merkley-Levin is that it covers more types of proprietary trading than the original rule proposed by the administration.

However, conferees blew a hole in the proprietary trading ban at the request of Senator Scott Brown (R-Mass.), whose vote may be needed in the Senate to pass the bill. The amendment allows banks to invest in hedge funds and private equity funds. The rule allows them to invest 3% of their private equity capital. This sounds like a small number, but this money can be hugely leveraged. So, for instance, Bear Stearns put $40 million into a hedge fund during the heyday of the housing bubble, and had to pony up $3.2 billion when that investment backfired in 2007 -- literally 80 times what they put into it. This may be one of the worst provisions in the bill, and Brown was aided by the New Dem coalition in his fight to deliver this loophole to Wall Street.

FUTURE FIGHTS

The lack of progress on separating the taxpayer guarantee from the big bank derivatives trade leaves taxpayers on the hook for a future derivatives crisis. When these crises inevitably occur, they will give new fuel to measures such as that offered by Senators Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Ted Kaufman (D-Del.) to shrink the size of “too big to fail” institutions so that taxpayers will not have to go down with the Wall Street titans.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm all for Financial Reform

I'm all for Financial Reform but I'd like to hear some "balanced" info on the matter. I can't help but think you are skewed to one side of the debate. Hey there's nothing wrong with that but it really serves no purpose when trying to give a fair analysis.

One thing that stumps me here is whether Wall Street is the "casino" or the "gamblers". You seem to call them both in this post. The banks should stay out of trading. The investment banks(now bank-holding companies: Morgan Stanley, Goldman)should stay out of banking. One is not the other though they try to be. You should really call the banks(main street) the gamblers and Wall St.(Goldman, Morgan Stanley, etc) the casinos.

What is your definition of Wall Street? The Banks? Or the bank-holding companies/old investment banks? There is a tremendous difference between the two. First, Goldman, MS(also the now defunct LEH and BS) aren't banks. Though they became BHC's at the height of the crisis, they are not banks. They are Wall St. The banks, which tried to be Wall St by venturing into trading, are not Wall St. They should not, and should never have been allowed to, open trading desks, own hedge funds, be involved with PE firms, etc. This is what killed us. True GS, MS, LEH, BS were wreck-less and put the countries liquidity at risk but they weren't the only devil behind this collapse.
The banks and insurance companies getting into the trading business, via the collapse of Glass-Steagal, and trying to generate the profits that were previously only the domain of the true Wall ST firms is another culprit.

Unfortunately, this is not Wall St. Though you may lump the banks in with the GS's of the world they aren't and shouldn't be. As an ex-Wall St employee who left because he hated the "system" I can tell you from experience that banks are not Wall St and will be, or never should be. The high ups in all of the Wall St firms, as dirty as they may be, mock the fact that banks have come to the trading floor. It's more money for them to take from someone else.

Just because many of the banks now reside near Wall St. doesn't make them part of it. The banks are main street. As in, when they "bring their gloves to the park to play" those gloves belong to you and I.(Yes, I too am part of main street.) They bring our deposits to the floor and try to make money. Unfortunately they lost. This should absolutely not be allowed to happen. If wall St wants to lose the money that the raise for themselves, that's fine. But I'll be damned if my bank, who doesn't know jack about trading, takes my money to the floors and throws it around like a bunch of fools.

Plain and simple, bring back the separation of Glass-Steagal so the banks can't trade any more and Wall St. will have to leave the banking domain. People can play the political game and demonize Wall St, tax it or even just kick it in the collective balls but it won't do a damn thing to regulate them. One simple concept comes to mind: Re-incorporation. They will just move over seas and take their taxes with them.(Yes they pay taxes, a lot of it, and to say they don't is simply a lie.)

To cut my rambling short I'll exit with this:

With all this political trash talking and finger pointing going on, can you honestly say that what is being debated by political leaders will make a lick of difference?

It would be nice if the talking heads from both parties would finally put all the garbage rhetoric aside and seriously discuss this issue. I only wish the discussion you and Sly had this morning would have been such a conversation. There were damn good points brought up but the bias was way too apparent. It felt like the Dem's political ad.

My apologies for the long winded and often chaotic response. I wish you well. Take care.