The fate of the Wall Street reform bill is up in the air after the death of Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia. The bill is a single confirmed vote short of the 60 votes needed to get past a threatened filibuster by Senate Republicans. From day one, the Bankster team has supported the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and that is still one of the strongest pieces of the bill. It is a great time to send off the last emails to Senators telling them to put a new cop on the block in the form of a CFPB.
We want to hear from you about what you think of the bill and what grade you would give it if you were a kindergarten teacher grading Congress on its performance. Conceptually, the bill breaks down into three main parts.
1. CONSUMER PROTECTION
The section dealing with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is very strong. The Bureau has independent regulatory and enforcement authority over a wide array of consumer financial products such as credit cards, mortgages, and even payday loans. Unfortunately, auto dealers escaped its jurisdiction, but there is no doubt the CFPB will be a new cop on the block policing the safety and soundness of common consumer products. Consumer advocate Elizabeth Warren, who first floated the idea of a CFPB two years ago, is happy with the final result. What grade would you give this section of the bill?
2. ENDING THE CASINO
Warren Buffet's famous "weapons of financial mass destruction," also known as over the counter derivatives, will be holstered. In a big win for reformers, large Wall Street firms engaged in speculative food and energy derivatives trading will be forced to spin off their derivatives desks into a separately capitalized affiliate, making speculation in these markets much more costly. In addition, all trades will be cleared by regulators and exchange traded where pricing and positions will be transparent. Capital requirements and margin requirements will apply, putting real money behind the bets. Position limits will apply, making it more difficult for a few players to dominate the market. Though we lost the battle to apply this "spin off" provision to all derivatives trading, the fact that energy and food is covered is a big win for American consumers and small African nations. Former CFTC Chair Brooksley Born, who tried to get derivatives regulated way back in 1999, is happy with this section of the bill. What grade would you give this section of the bill?
3. TOO BIG TO FAIL
It is with the big picture structural issues that the bill falls short. It is true that the new bill will apply tighter capital and leveraging requirements, but these decisions are left to future regulators and international negotiations in Basel Switzerland. Reformers succeeded in getting a strengthened "Volcker Rule" into the bill, banning proprietary trading and conflict of interest trading, but it was weakened by a hedge fund loophole. Reformers succeeded in getting a pretty solid audit of the Federal Reserve, but the bill will not end "to big to fail" because taxpayers are still on the hook for big bank failures. Big banks were not forced to prepay into a fund for future bailouts, and taxpayer subsidies for the big banks were not ended. Too big to fail institutions were not shrunk in size (either with a size cap or a comprehensive derivatives spin-off proposal). Glass-Steagall was not restored. Destructive "naked" credit default swaps were not banned. At the end of the day, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is happy with this result. What grade would you give this section of the bill?
If these were separate bills, they would amount to three easy votes. But because they are lumped together things get a bit complicated. Tell us what you think in the comments section below and we will issue a Bankster scorecard next week.
520 University Avenue, Suite 260 | Madison, WI 53703, U.S.A. | Tel 1-608-260-9713
BanksterUSA is a project of the Center for Media and Democracy.
Bank Reform
I'm not an economist and I don't pretend to have a clue how the economy operates. But I do have pretty good instincts.
CONSUMER PROTECTION
A - Sounds pretty solid to me. I've seen the "warnings" on my credit card statements already. I don't necessarily need them now, but the 20 somethings do.
ENDING THE CASINO
B - Credit default swaps and collaterized debt obligations? Who understands these things?
TO BIG TO FAIL
F - I'm pessimistic on this one. The optimist in me hopes this one failed because its inclusion would hinder the country's economic recovery. The pessimist says that the $3.5B spent lobbying Congress wasn't spent to ensure my wealth and wellbeing.
Senate Bank Reform
Again the Blue Dog Democrats (or those congressmen who are truly corporate lobbyists as opposed to supporting the people) AND the obstructionist Republicans watered this Bill down so significantly that we will NOT see reform. Instead, we will see a lot more gambling on derivatives (due to a greatly weakened Volcker Rule)and we WILL SEE another housing bubble burst into massive foreclosures. The concept of the G8 (or G20) Commission is bad, bad, bad for the world economy and Obama listening to Rahm emanual vs. Dick Durbin is appalling! The G8 requires world financial leaders to NOT help their fellow countrymen unless their fellow countrymen are in the top 2% of the richest in their country because all rational worldwide economists tell us we need more stimulus to get jobs going in America via manufacturing and credits or subsidies to small businesses (at least let the small businesses acquire loans much more easily)--but G8 stated we need to STOP all stimulus and pay down our debts which is impossible for America with ALL the tax breaks for corporates and the ubba rich along with funding three wars plus! There's NOTHING in this legislation to help small business and generate jobs AND there remains the "too-big-to-fail" "gangsta bankstas" who rip off Americans at every opportunity to serve the greed of these financial monopolies and the ubba rich. Wall Street is protected in their predatory behavior on America's middle class in an effort to continue funneling monies to the ubba rich as the top 10% of Americans--the ubba rich--own over 90% of all stock.
Bank "Reform Bill"
I rate the whole bill an "F"
Barney Frank and newly placed Brown have opened several important loopholes for their own financial constituencies that defeat the whole premise of "reform"
Whenever any government agency, politico or other representatives utter the word "reform" I know it's going to be a total mess and the common folk will always loose.
Courage from both major parties has fled the capitol.
Our country is just being set up for more speculation and money swindling.
Too bad Brooksley Born wasn't able to boot the likes of Greenspan, Rubin and others in the groin back in the nineties!
"Reform" bill? I don't think so!
We will have no real reform until the Federal Reserve's immense power is checked, its books are audited and it is held accountable for its actions, which are at the center of our financial crisis. Having it house and fund the CFPB is PLAYING RIGHT INTO ITS HAND. So, in my opinion, this current reform bill is laughable because it does not create real change and merely continues catering to the Federal Reserve and giving it all the power.
Bank reform bill
Thanks Mary for all you do to help us. This watered down bill is no more reform than me telling my kids by phone to quiet down. Maybe when the demmos get a backbone this would be a time to get real reform.
Financial Reform Bill
1. Consumer Protection - "B" - Though I have very measured expectations, I look forward to seeing what Elizabeth Warren will bring forward.
2. Derivatives Trading - "C-" - Without including all derivatives, it's very weak and unlikely that this will be fixed short
of an another or worse financial disaster. Regulation always lags so badly behind the never -ending creativity of humanity's
worse characteristics - greed and false power.
3. TBTF - "F------" Between the supreme court decision to give corporations carte blanche to hi-jack (openly and blatantly) our election process, the legislative branch has proven their unwillingness to bring corporations back into scale for the betterment of our country. I can't think of any other events, with the exception of bush v gore election, that have given me more despair that the trajectory of this country is ever downward. I heard that Exxon/Mobile is pursuing the take-over to BP - "and the beat goes on".
Thank you for all your efforts. Success is in the pursuit of what you believe in, not in the outcome of your efforts.
Bank Reform Bill
You can't be serious! This bureau will protect the consumer the same way the securities and exchange commission protected us from Wall Street or the way the FCC protects us from the media thieves, specifically not at all. Indeed it will become a protection agency FOR the banks against any consumer involvement just like all the other phoney government protection administrations. Grade: "A" if you are a bankster or stock holder- "F" if you are a consumer
This part of the bill really tells the story of congress! "Weapons of mass destruction" are not made illegal as they should be, but rather the unscrupulous immoral act of manipulation for profit will require the despotic thieves to spin off a separate entity to carry out these dastardly activities which will now have "rules" and requirements such as actual "real money" in order to dominate. If anybody thinks this is reform they get an "F" Vulture capitalists and their investors will give it an "A"
Too big to fail is COMMUNISM at its' best. Anti-capitalistic, anti-free market, and un-American. How anyone in the United States could be sold on this bull is amazing. Actually the public was not, but democratic politicians oddly were. Of course if you are a stock holder and stand to profit from the stealing of public funds you probably like the idea. The federal reserve must be exposed to public scrutiny before being terminated. Why does the congress think that removing the regulations implemented as the lessons learned from the worst investment/banking disaster is a good idea? And having removed them caused an even bigger world wide financial disaster why are they not restoring these regulations which worked so well for 70 years? I suppose if you are a Timothy Geithner or a rich member of congress you would give this an "A". However any ordinary hard working American or other victim of this scam would see through this "reform" and give it the "F" in deserves.
This is just more proof that the entire congress as well as the white house is serving the thieves who have stolen democracy itself from the people of the United States. The republicans and their brazen display of conserving the status quo for themselves and their culture of open theft and christian sponsored immorality are apparently still in control of government obviated by the fact that democrats can't even pass a bill which entrenches the banksters responsible for the worst financial disaster ever conceived. Oh unless you happened to profit from it. This is theater at its' best.
Wall Street Reform A Tragic Lie
Consumer Finance Protection Bureau - F
Not only does it fail to cover auto dealers, it also does not regulate community banks, where a very high proportion of Americans borrow money. CFPB is a tragic lie.
Casino - C-
I'm probably being generous here. Wall Street wrote the regulation, so it's gotta be bad. Brooksly Born's opinion swayed me to give this part a higher grade than it probably deserves.
TBTF - F
TBTF is a sick joke. A couple of years ago, we had 18 or 19 major banks; now we have what? Six? One limited audit of the Federal Reserve, when We The People should be taking the Fed back from the private banksters. No restoration of Glass-Steagall.
The worst part is that this awful, awful bill will pass, and people will be lulled into thinking the banks have been regulated. Until the next disaster.
For a better way, go to www.steadystate.org and sign on to the Position Statement of the Center for the Advancement of a Steady State Economy.
On the community banks issue,
On the community banks issue, banks will not be visited by CFPB bank examiners (so in that way they escaped coverage) but their products are covered, so their mortgages and their credit cards and their other loans and products are all covered by the CFPB, just FYI.
Mary Bottari at BanksterUSA
Thanks for responding
I'm not sure exactly what it means, that the "products" are covered but the banks are not subject to CFPB bank examiners, but I appreciate your response. I still think the bill is dangerous because people will think that the finance industry is being regulated while in fact Wall Street lobbyists wrote the legislation and their clients know exactly how to game the system to their own benefit.
Bank Bill Gets an F-----
This financial reform bill is Washington theatrics at its worse. It completely ignores the root causes of the 2008 financial crises - the supposed reason for the legislation. But Washington insiders have an agenda, and the could care less that more regulations will only exacerbate the moral hazards and credit misallocations that produced the last financial crisis and lay the foundation for an even larger one in the future.
And to make matters worse, this bill gives the Fed even more power to inflict harm on our economy! Government created monstrosities like Fannie and Freddie are left unchecked, and to add insult to injury this bill enshrines mechanisms for future bailouts.
NO ON THE FINANCIAL 'REFORM' BILL.
Wasn't this bill supposed to 'reform' something? I challenge you to show me where it does that?
Bank Reform Bill
Ms. Bottari:
Is this where we respond to the Bank Reform Bill survey?
If so, after reading yesterday's NYT's article on Paul Volcker and reading your very concise synopsis, I would rate it, overall, as a "B," perhaps, if we're lucky, a "B+."
CONSUMER PROTECTION:
Elizabeth Warren: YES! ("A-")
END THE CASINO:
Brooksley Born: YES! (A-")
TOO BIG TO FAIL:
Timothy Geithner: NO! NO! NO! (weak "C-")
[It needs a restoration of Glass Steagall. It's still too easy for the "TOO-BIGS" to steal.] Geithner is clearly too big an ally of the TOO-BIGS
OVERALL RATING: " B"
The Bill is very complicated and will require determination by regulators---characteristically and historically easily cowed and neutered by the "TOO BIGs" and the endemic corruption by the TOO-BIGS of Congress. That probably will continue!
"BANKSTER" Is WONDERFUL!! Keep at it. Your work is so important!
George Puchta
Getting close to 60 votes!
Update from Monday......
Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME) has joined fellow Republican Senators Susan Collins (ME) and Scott Brown (MA) and will vote FOR financial reform conference agreement.
Voting for (59): All Dems except Feingold and Nelson (D-NE); three Republicans above.
Voting against (37): All Republicans except three above. Feingold too.
Undecided (2): Moderate Democrat Ben Nelson (NE) and Republican Chuck Grassley (R-IA).
Vacancy (1): Sen Byrd (D-WV) to eventually be filled by appointment.
Consumer Financial Protection Bill
This bill is an absolute joke,it does nothing protect the taxpayer with real reform. The senate bill has had all the regulations and amendments that could stop the big banks from gambling with our tax dollars removed by the bankster Senators.
I think most of Congress Democrat or Republican, most of the Administration Democrat or Republican, are completely bought and paid for by the financial and other powerful lobbies.
Anything that the House Committee on Financial Services, the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, & Urban Affairs, introduce and pass that Obama doesn’t veto has already been approved by the special interests. That the Financial Sector Banks and Wall Street object strongly to proposed legislation is camouflage to make it seem like the politicians are actually doing their job for the American People. They are actually doing their higher paid job for the financial lobbies. The end result should be called the Consumer Financial Destruction Act because that is a better description of what will be accomplished.
I think both parties are conning us worse than Madoff conned his victims. The Demlocans and the Republicrats are feeding the middle class to the sharks on Wall Street. It's Time to vote them all out and keep doing it every election till we get a government for the people.
Unreconciled.
It'll be (un)just(ly) ANOTHER lying DEM renege on behalf of the BERNANKSTERS, Wall Street-walkers and their Gasoline Alley Grease-gun molls of the ruling US, MIC junta!
Senate Banking Bill
Another website tracks what the Labor Unions along with Obama and Pelosi are sneakily trying to do.
It says that the Unions have added to the Finance Bill a provision for them to gain control over all "first responders" requiring them to join unions and causing problems to town governments all over.
bank reform bill
I give it a big fat F. Too little, too late and pretty much all talk, no teeth. The most important thing, breaking up the banks, did not happen. Without this, the bill really isn't going to make much difference. Any consumer protection agency under the Fed roof will be hand cuffed. Ole Timmy boy should be in jail, not in charge. The corporations/banksters own the country and taking it back will be akin to an act of war. I'm so frustrated with letter writing, email sending, phone calls, etc. which generally have little and sometimes no affect. We get crumbs for our efforts when we need the whole sandwich. We can't demonstrate or do much protesting for fear of criminal prosecution. The rich keep getting richer and the rest of us are getting poorer. The way it's going, pretty soon manor houses with serfs cleaning the pools and houses and serving the meals will dot the country side. This is not the future I envision for my children/grandchildren. Like a lot of other people, I got sucked into Obama's "hope and change" rhetoric. I see now that Obumma isn't much different than any other politician. They won't fix the financial mess because the wealthy like it just the way it is. I guess we're just going to have to find a more effective way to reclaim our country.
Bank Reform Bill 2010
Parts 1 and 2 above get a B+ or an A- while Part 3 gets a C and needs work: NO MORE BAILOUTS, establish a PREPAID Failure Fund; and REGULATE THE HEDGE FUNDS.
Sign the nuclear option petition
http://credoaction.change.org/petitions/view/end_the_obstruction_vote_in...
It's time to end the obstruction of the will of the majority by the right wing.
bank bill
i give the bill a grade of F
it fails to prevent another economic disaster by allowing greed to prevail!
Well said
Says it all!!!
reform bill
Consumer Protection Bureau--Could be a good thing but under the Federal Reserve it will be worthless.
Anything that Geithner would be pleased with, I would vote against. The man should be in jail.
There are too many loopholes in the bill. Frankly, I don't think the bill will make a big difference. The corporations and banks already own the government
I absolutely agree...
This is just a dog and pony show bill with enough loopholes to make swiss cheese look bad! The crooks are aiding the crooks and trying to look like they are doing something positive while just using smoke and mirrors. Jail these bastards!
Reform Bill
I totally agree with your assessment. It is all worthless. Scrap it and start again. This time don't give the criminal Banksters a vote or a voice, protect the people, jail the Banksters. They should all be in jail on racketeering charges at the very least. Why are we allowing criminals and their hired stooges to make our laws?
Charles Michael Couch
Brooklyn, NY
Not enough on any of it.
The reform bill does not go far enough in any respect, but especially egregious is the lacking found in the TBTF category. I'd give all 3 sections a D grade.
Financial reform
Any reform regulated by and within the government is bound to compromise and failure. It needs an independent, public review board to have any teeth. Once again, an example of the fox guarding the henhouse. When will we ever learn? Answer....never...it is far past too late.
Well if they make two small
Well if they make two small changes in the bill I have your one vote. As Feingold said this morning this bill is akin to needing heart surgery with a remedy that fixes your foot. Single go back to 1999 rules and break up the banks that are "too big to fail".
Bankster Vote
Every single one of the Rs in the Senate need to be booted out. They have not voted for one thing that would help and protect the taxpayers. They are so busy trying to make Obama's Presidency a failure that the people of America are nothing but collateral damage to them. Just look at their voting records since Obama took office and see what they have done to play their "screw You" politics to the voters. If we want to get anything passed, especially the over 300 Bills that the Rs have blocks on in the Senate, we need to put MORE Dems in the Senate. If you want the country even worse than what Bush did to it, that's what the Rs have to offer. So people better wake up and get MORE DEMS in the Senate so we can have all the protections and legislature that is waiting in the wings, having already been passed thru the House, some languishing in the Senate for 2 years, just one is the Ethics Bill. Apparently the Rs don't want their ethics corrected. If there is not 60 votes a Bill cannot pass; and that is caused by the dirty tactics played by Rs, and their filibusters and if a Bill even makes it to the floor over all their hurdles, they vote NO on it. Get out and VOTE, VOTE for Dems if you want to get the Bush and Gang damage repaired. VOTE VOTE VOTE
consumer protection?
Let me see if I wanted some one to protect the consumers of this nation where would I find the qualified individuals to conceive and implement real protection? Well how about from the group of scoundrels that the consumer needs protection from, who could be better qualified? A commission could be created to ensure no real protection could ever be imposed on the industry from consumers or states or any other entity. Another securities and exchange commission or F.C.C. Placing it in the Fed would ensure that any evidence could be quickly shredded and the auditors and top management are never too far away from each other. Requiring the thieves to spin off a separate entity to perform the most dastardly financial transactions is a bold move from those sworn to protect the public. Maybe we should award a medal of brave public action in the face of despotic human suffering to those with the courage to vote for this bill?
What I see is the complete submission of our so called leaders to the very forces of evil that have taken control of Washington and perverted democracy to the point of hopelessness. If I were a bankster I would give this legislation an "A" because it allows business as usual while giving the appearance of reform, it allows for the creation of a "regulatory agency" which banksters can use to protect industry from outside forces trying to impose any real consumer involvement, and it maintains the FED as the sole power. You could say it is the Gafia or government mafia.
From a consumer point of view it gets an "F" because it fundamentally does nothing to protect consumers. It gets an "F" because like most of the trash that passes for legislation it is basically a trojan horse that is a "gift" for the people on the surface, but actually contains the seeds of a future defeat.
Isn't this typical of congress and the white house. When are we going to realize that members of government are the agents of those who exploit the public of the United States of America. They are socialists whose modus operandi is to privitize the resources of the public and socialize the costs of exploitation as well as taxing the public to cover the costs of administration.